| หน้าแรก | รูปงานคอสเพลย์ | อุปกรณ์เสริม | เว็บบอร์ด | ตารางงานคอสเพลย์ | คอสเพลย์วิกิ | คอสพลัส | วิดีโอ | เกี่ยวกับ & ติดต่อเรา |  
 
 
 
###### Coming Soon ######
 
 
 






รายงานข่าวสารที่อัพเดทในเว็บไซต์ Props&Ops ตามลำดับช่วงเวลา













Plurilateral Agreement Example

Finally, there is the argument that all of this makes no difference, because there is virtually no real choice. The Doha Round has failed and is unlikely to return. A fisheries agreement remains a possibility, as is an agreement on e-commerce, but these are problematic and far more limited than the Tokyo round or the Uruguay Round agreements or what the Doha Round should be. Second, a theory of plurilaterals is that their dissemination creates the need to bring them together into a truly multilateral agreement. We are a long way from that, but it is a fascinating idea, not least because the obvious place for that is in the World Trade Organization (WTO), which would help the organization return to its fundamental objective of trade liberalization. In this scenario, the world gets a robust WTO through the back door and not through the front door, but it still gets one. The agreement has two elements: the general rules and obligations and the schedules of each participant whose purchases of listed goods, services and services are subject to the agreement when they exceed the thresholds set out in the calendars. The general rules and obligations mainly concern tendering procedures. They have evolved through different versions of the agreement to improve the fair and non-discriminatory conditions of international competition and to reflect new developments in the area of procurement. B, for example the widespread use of electronic means in tenders. Governments are also required to put in place national procedures for aggrieved private bidders to challenge award decisions and obtain remedies if such decisions are taken in contradiction with the rules of the agreement.

The coverage plans included in the agreement have moved from central agencies to sub-central agencies, utilities and public enterprises, as well as goods, services and all types of construction services. Ambassador Lighthizer recently revived a topic that scientists have discussed in the past, but which has generally not been the subject of political debate in the United States – whether the continuation of regional or multilateral agreements poses a threat to the multilateral trading system. He did so with a biblical reference in calling the European Commission a Pharisee for the defence of multilateralism and the exercise of bilateralism. What is remarkable is that this government, despite little evidence, with the exception of the vice-president, liked to use the Bible as an accessory that each of them had actually read it.

Comments are closed.